The ranQ Trust Score
The ranQ Trust Score is a trust measure for Swiss companies and brands. On a scale of 0.0 to 5.0 it shows how trustworthy and recommendable a provider is in the market. Every company in the directory is assessed by the same criteria, whether or not it is a ranQ customer.
Scoring grid
Each criterion is normalised to 0–100 and then averaged by weight.
The ranQ Trust Score is reported on a scale of 0.0 to 5.0 with one decimal — the same scale as customer ratings — and is made up of reputation (42%), substance (28%), identity (22%) and visibility (8%). Missing data lowers the reported data basis, not the score; below a 50% data basis no score is published. The score cannot be bought.
- Reputation42%
- Substance28%
- Identity22%
- Visibility8%
- Total100%
Review quality24%
The average rating across all connected sources, smoothed against the industry mean. So 5.0 stars from three reviews do not outrank 4.7 from three hundred.
Review volume10%
The number of reviews across all sources. The scale is logarithmic: the first reviews count the most, and the maximum is reached at 50 reviews.
Review recency8%
The age of the most recent review. Two-year-old reviews deliberately sit in the middle, because that is normal for Swiss SMEs. Only after three years without a new voice does the value drop markedly.
Establishment12%
Years since founding or brand launch, logarithmic. The maximum is reached at 15 years.
Company size7%
The headcount band, researched by ranQ or stated by the company. It is scored in steps rather than by head count, because the data only provides bands.
Legal form6%
Graded by liability and disclosure. The weight is kept small: a sole proprietorship is not a dubious company, it is just liable differently.
Branch offices3%
Branch offices linked in the commercial register. Having none is normal and costs no points.
Verification22%
Official register entry (commercial register with UID or professional-body record, 55 points), confirmed domain (20 points) and confirmed ranQ profile (up to 25 points, depending on completeness).
Website authority4%
Ahrefs' Domain Rating measures, on a scale of 0 to 100, how strongly a website is linked from other websites. For Swiss SMEs the range up to 40 is typical; the maximum is reached at 35.
Media authority4%
Quality and number of editorial mentions, weighted by the importance of the source, plus the recency of the latest high-quality mention.
Qualifications as a bonus
Outside the 100% weighting, as a capped bonus.
+0.05
per company certificate
ISO 9001, Minergie, OEKO-TEX, FSC, association partnerships
+0.038
per personal qualification
Federal master's diploma, federal diploma of higher education, association or chamber membership
+0.15
maximum in total
About 3% of the scale — the bonus nuances a placement, it can never carry it
ranQ does not verify these details. They are self-declared by the companies. That is exactly why the bonus sits outside the weighting and is capped so low.
When data is missing
The model's most important fairness decision — and the reason some profiles show no score.
Missing data does not lower the score
If a criterion is missing, it is not counted as zero but taken out of the weighting; the remaining weights are redistributed. Instead, the data basis is reported as a percentage. A company without a review profile is not bad, just less well documented.
No score below 50%
A score is only published when at least half of the weighting is backed by data and at least two areas other than identity have data. Otherwise «No score yet» appears with the list of missing evidence. This prevents scores extrapolated from three criteria that look like an overall verdict.
What the numbers mean
Every score is placed in a band.
| Range | Rating | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 4.5 – 5.0 | Excellent | All four areas strong, complete data basis. |
| 4.0 – 4.4 | Very high | Well backed throughout, with some reserves. |
| 3.3 – 3.9 | High | The well-backed norm: reputation and identity solid, substance or visibility weaker. |
| 2.5 – 3.2 | Solid | Basics in place, several criteria weak — mostly young or less visible businesses. |
| below 2.5 | Basic | Little evidence available. Deliberately neutral, never a warning. |
| Data basis < 50% | No score yet | No score. A statement about our data, not about the company. |
The key answers
What does the ranQ Trust Score measure?
Can the Trust Score be bought?
What happens when data is missing?
How are the placements in comparisons determined?
My company is recorded incorrectly — what can I do?
Versions and sources
Model changes
Every change to criteria, weights or formulas gets a dated model version.
v3.0
September 2026
Current version: four areas with ten criteria on a scale of 0.0 to 5.0 with one decimal — the same scale customer ratings use. Qualifications as a capped bonus outside the weighting, publication threshold at a 50% data basis.
Where the data comes from
Every detail can be checked at its source.
Data sources
- Commercial register — Zefix: legal form, UID, founding year, branch offices
- Reviews — Google Business Profile and other connected sources
- Website authority — Domain Rating by Ahrefs
- Media authority — our own index of editorial mentions
- Qualifications — stated by the companies, unverified
Something recorded incorrectly?
The report function on every profile lets you correct individual data points. We review the report and correct it within ten working days; the correction takes effect with the next recalculation.
Every company sees the subscores and their basis in its own profile. On request we disclose the exact calculation.